In 1986, when Amy Bishop was 20-years-old, she shot her brother after she had a fight with her father as he was leaving their Massachhusetts home. Her mother, the only witness, said her son's death was an accident. Amy went on to marry, earn a Ph.D. at Harvard, have children and work.
People remember her as being quite a menace in their quiet Massachusetts neighborhood. It is said that she tried to get her child's teacher fired and also successfully barred an ice cream truck from coming to her street because, she said, her children were lactose intolerant. In 1993, she and her husband were suspects in an attempted pipe bombing of a doctor she had worked for at Boston Children's Hospital. And in 2002, she punched a woman in a House of Pancakes and then fled with her family. The manager wrote down her license plate, though, so she was brought to court and convicted of assault.
Astonishingly and unfortunately, the administration at the University of Alabama did not have any of this information when they hired Amy Bishop, but they denied her tenure recently. Her research and publications did not meet high enough standards for tenure, and students criticized her for being disorganized, not making eye contact, simply reading from a textbook and too often expressing her extreme political views with unsettling passion. Several weeks ago, during a department meeting at the university, Amy Bishop pulled out a loaded gun and killed three colleagues and wounded others.
It appears she was psychotic, most likely suffering from paranoid schizophrenia. Having this mental illness, however, should not necessarily exonerate her from being convicted of murder and serving her sentence. She planned the attack; she got a gun; she trained with it at a local shooting range; she brought the loaded gun with her to the department meeting; and she calmly got up and started systematically shooting her colleagues in their heads.
Having gotten away with so much all her life, she might have started to believe that she was invincible and that when all the facts were presented, she would be exonerated. She may think that her powers of persuasion are so great and her genius so valuable, that she will go free. She most likely convinced herself that she had been wronged and that the people she killed deserved it. She probably believes that somehow, once again, she won't have to pay for the consequences of her actions.
What is certain, however, is that Amy Bishop should not get away with assault and murder this time. She knew what she was doing and knew right from wrong when she fired her loaded gun and killed and injured her innocent colleagues.
I'm Dr. Blokar. For more information, click on the following resources: