Post a comment
Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.
Your Information
(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.
Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.
Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.
Your Information
(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)
This was a study relating to the minimum instream flows needed to sustain endangered salmonid populations in river systems where there are many competing demands for water - hydropower, irrigation, and municipal drinking water being the major needs. In many western rivers, every drop of water is strictly meted out between users with varying claims via a very complex system of water rights. Many rivers are over-appropriated, meaning that there are more rights to remove water than there is water to remove, leaving nothing for fish. A long series of federal court cases, still ongoing, relate to the requirement to leave water in the rivers to support endangered species. All the parties to that litigation have different ideas of how much water fish need to survive. The study, and others like it, seek to set a firm minimum quantity of water that must remain in the river as an "instream flow" to support endangered salmonid populations.
Posted by: V. Ryan | June 01, 2009 at 12:31 PM
Thank you for the additional information. In this age of "sound bites" this serves to remind us that it's always good to read past the headline. Thank you for educating us all on this important issue.
Posted by: The Starry Eye | June 11, 2009 at 10:49 AM